Behind the word "insurance person" live two different roles: the agent represents the insurer, the broker acts on the client's instructions. Not wordplay – the direction of the mandate decides who works for whom.
- A broker acts on the client's mandate: competing several insurers' offers and reading conditions with the client's eyes.
- At a claim, reporting straight to the insurer is fastest – the broker steps in at stalled or disputed cases, helping where they can.
- The client does not pay for the advice – insurers pay the intermediary remuneration; the decision still remains the client's.
The mandate's direction: the essence
Legally the broker is the client's appointee: not selling one insurer's products but seeking a market solution for the client's need. In practice this is four jobs: needs assessment (the real risk), competition (several offers, one table), translating conditions (what the exclusion, the limit, the deductible mean – in plain language), and – if you let me know – caring for the contracts (renewal comparison, notification of changes).
The broker does not take over the decision: I assess and inform – the choice at every point is the client's. And only what the conditions can deliver may be promised.
The claim: where the role shows
Claims are the broker model's exam – but not in the sense that the broker carries every claim. Routine claims run fastest through the insurer's own channel (claims line, online portal); the best I can do there is make sure the client knows the steps in advance. The broker adds real value where the case stalls or the settlement is questionable: then I refer to the terms and help where I can. Not every dispute can be won – but I try to make sure the client does not fight alone.
For companies this is measurable in time too: the broker helps take the stalled cases and disputes off the company's hands, where possible – our fleet article shows this in detail.
The remuneration – transparently
The intermediary remuneration is paid by the insurer after the contracts concluded; the advice costs the client nothing. A fair question: does this not skew the proposal? My answer is how I work: several insurers' offers in one table, judged by the same criteria, my recommendation reasoned.
The long-term relationship is the real auditor: at every renewal the client sees what the competition delivers – and can always decide differently.
A question tailored to your company? Book a free 20-minute consultation →
