Insights · Process and Decision

When should you use a broker – and when not?

As a broker, it would be in my interest for the answer to this question to always be "right now." Reality is more nuanced: there are cases where a broker brings real value, and cases where the direct route is entirely fine. This article draws the line – honestly.

In brief:
  • The more complex the portfolio – more contracts, more premises, partner requirements – the more keeping it in one hand is worth.
  • For a single simple, standard policy, the direct route can be fine too – especially if you have the time and inclination to deal with it.
  • The entry point is typically not a product question but an event: growth, a tender, a claims lesson, a feeling of disorder.

When is the direct route enough?

An honest list: if the company has one or two standard contracts (say, property cover for a small office), the situation is stable, and someone is willing to spend an hour at each renewal on comparison – direct binding works fine. The market for mandatory motor cover is also well established. The point here too isn't the channel, it's diligence: reading the conditions and an annual look-over are mandatory steps even direct – the policy doesn't maintain itself there either.

When does a broker bring real value?

The equation flips in four typical situations. At complexity: several contracts, several insurers, premises, a fleet, benefits – here keeping it in one hand (table, map, renewal dates) saves money and risk on its own: renewal table, cover map. At a special need: tender requirements, a foreign client, project cover, larger liability limits – where market knowledge is the entry ticket: tenders, foreign client requirements. At claims experience: anyone who has once carried a difficult claim through alone knows what how the broker helps is worth. And at the time question: tendering, administration and paperwork are work that can be outsourced – the decision stays with you.

What does it cost, and how do you start?

The model is transparent: I charge the client no fee for advice, the intermediary remuneration is paid by the insurer – the details: what a broker does, and who pays. The risk-free way in is the portfolio review: bring the existing policies, and decide on next steps based on the diagnosis – it's also a perfectly fine outcome if everything stays exactly as it was. On the framework of the mandate, factually: representation and power of attorney.

A question tailored to your company? Book a free 20-minute consultation →

This article is for information purposes only and contains general information; it does not constitute an offer, or insurance, legal or tax advice. The specific covers, exclusions and pricing are set by the insurers' terms and conditions in force at any given time – it is worth going through these item by item when you request a quote. Updated: August 2026.

Related articles

Portfolio review in 20 minutes – bring your existing policies.

Free of charge and without obligation: I review what you have, and where there might be a gap or overlap – the decision is always yours.

Book a time